Making sense of what the world is betting onTrade on Kalshi →
KalshiRadarKalshiRadar
Image for Verve-102's 82% Approval Odds: Am I Missing Something?

Verve-102's 82% Approval Odds: Am I Missing Something?

Kalshi bettors are giving Verve-102 an 82% chance of FDA approval by 2035, but I'm looking closely at the early-stage data and thinking that number might be a bit optimistic.

Prediction Market

Will the FDA approve VERVE-102 before Jan 1, 2035?

Yes81%
No19%
Volume$282
ClosesJanuary 1, 2035
Trade on Kalshi

Will the FDA approve VERVE-102 before Jan 1, 2035?

Loading chart...

I've been staring at the Kalshi market for VERVE-102's FDA approval, and honestly, the 82% YES price is making my eyebrows climb right off my face. Eighty-two percent! That means the crowd is overwhelmingly confident that Verve Therapeutics' gene-editing therapy will get the green light from the FDA before January 1, 2035. As someone who watches these markets religiously, that number feels audacious for a drug in this stage of development.

For those of you who might not be deep into biotech, VERVE-102 is a fascinating candidate. It's an investigational gene-editing medicine designed to permanently turn off the PCSK9 gene in the liver, aiming to lower LDL cholesterol for people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Basically, it’s a potential one-time treatment for a condition that currently requires lifelong medication for millions. The scientific promise is huge, no doubt about it. The idea of a permanent fix for high cholesterol is, on paper, incredibly appealing, especially for patients who struggle with existing therapies.

But let's talk about that 82%. What does it really mean? It means if you bet $82 now on YES, you'd get $100 back if it gets approved. Conversely, if you bet $18 on NO, you'd get $100 if it doesn't. My first thought when I saw that price was, "Are people factoring in how brutal and long the drug approval process is?" The market has traded 282 contracts, and there are 61 contracts currently open, suggesting a decent, albeit not massive, level of conviction and activity. These aren't just random guesses; there's real money behind these probabilities.

Here’s the thing you need to know about VERVE-102: it’s currently in a Phase 1 clinical trial, called Heart-1. Phase 1 is all about safety and dosage in a small group of people. While early data from Heart-1 has shown promising signs of LDL cholesterol reduction and a tolerable safety profile, we are still a very, very long way from FDA approval. Historically, the success rate for drugs entering Phase 1 to actually achieving FDA approval is depressingly low – often cited in the single digits, especially for novel modalities like gene editing. Even if it gets through Phase 2 and 3, which are much larger and more rigorous trials, there are still so many hurdles.

Consider the timeline. The market closes on January 1, 2035. That’s about 11 years from now. While 11 years might seem like a lot of time for drug development, it's actually not that long for a gene-editing therapy starting at Phase 1. Each phase of a clinical trial can take years, and that's assuming everything goes perfectly. Delays in enrollment, unexpected side effects, or even just statistical endpoints not being met can push timelines back significantly, or even kill a drug outright. And we haven't even mentioned the regulatory scrutiny that a first-in-class gene-editing therapy would face. The FDA is understandably cautious with these groundbreaking treatments, and rightly so.

So, where would I put my money? While the science behind VERVE-102 is exciting and certainly holds immense potential, I find it hard to justify an 82% approval probability right now. The market appears to be heavily weighting the potential upside and the long-term horizon, perhaps underestimating the sheer difficulty of navigating the clinical trial gauntlet for a gene-editing drug. My read on this is that the enthusiasm for gene editing and the unmet need for HeFH patients might be creating an overly optimistic price here.

If I were trading this, I'd be looking closely at the NO side. Eighteen percent seems remarkably low for the inherent risks involved in taking a Phase 1 gene therapy all the way to market in 11 years. There's a lot that can go wrong, and even a small setback could send those odds plummeting. I'm genuinely curious to see if this market adjusts as more data emerges from the Heart-1 trial and, eventually, as it (hopefully) progresses to later phases. For now, I'm watching that 82% and wondering if it's priced for perfection in a world that's anything but.

📈

Ready to trade on this market?

Put your predictions to the test. Trade on Kalshi — the first federally regulated prediction market exchange in the US.

Trade on Kalshi →

More in Tech

Image for MDMA for PTSD: Why Kalshi's 54% 'Yes' Has Me Scratching My Head
TechMay 24, 20263 min read

MDMA for PTSD: Why Kalshi's 54% 'Yes' Has Me Scratching My Head

I'm looking at Kalshi's market on MDMA approval for PTSD and I can't shake the feeling that the current 54% 'Yes' price is missing some major recent developments.

Odds:Yes 49%No 51%
An illustration of a futuristic nuclear fusion reactor, with plasma glowing brightly at its core, surrounded by complex machinery. Focus on both the scientific wonder and the engineering challenge.
TechApr 20, 20263 min read

Fusion by 2035? My Take on Kalshi's Ambitious Tech Bet

I'm looking at Kalshi's market on nuclear fusion, and while the 48% chance for achievement by 2035 feels bold, I think the crowd might be underestimating the monumental challenges ahead.

Odds:Yes 48%No 52%
A futuristic depiction of a modular nuclear reactor powering a high-tech data center on a secure military base, surrounded by a desert landscape.
TechApr 17, 20263 min read

Nuclear Data Centers: Is 58% 'Yes' Too Low for This Wild Idea?

I'm digging into a fascinating Kalshi market today: Will the US military kick off a nuclear-powered data center project before 2030?

Odds:Yes 51%No 49%