Making sense of what the world is betting onTrade on Kalshi →
KalshiRadarKalshiRadar
Image for Ashley Avignone as Bridesmaid: Why the 'NO' at 18% feels like a steal

Ashley Avignone as Bridesmaid: Why the 'NO' at 18% feels like a steal

I'm scratching my head at Kalshi's latest celebrity market, where bettors give Ashley Avignone a 41% shot at being a bridesmaid for Taylor Swift.

Prediction Market

Will Ashley Avignone be a Bridesmaid for the wedding of Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift?

Yes42%
No58%
Volume$4.4K
ClosesJanuary 1, 2030
Trade on Kalshi

Will Ashley Avignone be a Bridesmaid for the wedding of Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift?

Loading chart...

Alright, you know me, I spend way too much time sifting through Kalshi markets, looking for those little nuggets of insight, or just plain weirdness. And today, I found one that genuinely made me chuckle, then pause, then seriously consider putting my money where my mouth is. We're talking about the market, Will Ashley Avignone be a Bridesmaid for the wedding of Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift?

First off, can we address the elephant in the room? Kalshi has this market categorized under 'politics'. Politics! I mean, I know Taylor Swift is a force, but I don't think her bridal party selections fall under electoral influence, do you? It's a small, funny detail, but it speaks to the sometimes-quirky categorization on the platform, and it immediately grabbed my attention.

Now, let's get to the real meat of it. Right now, the 'YES' side, predicting Ashley *will* be a bridesmaid, is trading at a robust 41%. That means the market, collectively, thinks there's a 41% chance of this happening. On the flip side, 'NO' is sitting at a rather paltry 18%. This disparity is what really caught my eye. The remaining 41% is the implied 'spread' or 'vig', essentially what the market makers take for liquidity and risk, and what covers the difference between the sum of YES and NO not adding to 100%.

I've been watching this market for a bit, and it’s seen a decent amount of action. We’ve got 4,439 contracts traded, which tells me it's not just a couple of superfans throwing spare change around. There's real conviction, or at least real money, flowing into this. And with 2,683 contracts in open interest, people are holding these positions, signaling they’re betting on the long game. That's a good amount of liquidity for a celebrity-adjacent market like this. The market doesn't even close until January 1, 2030, which is another wild variable to consider. That’s nearly six years away!

Here’s my read on this: 41% for a 'YES' seems incredibly high, especially when you consider the sheer number of unknowns. We're talking about a wedding that hasn't even been announced, between two people who, while very public, are still navigating their relationship. And then, we're predicting a specific role for a specific friend within that hypothetical event, almost six years down the line. That's a lot of dominoes that need to fall just right.

Ashley Avignone is, from what I understand, a longtime friend of Taylor Swift. She's been seen with Taylor at various events, including Chiefs games. So, there's a clear connection. But friendships, especially in the high-pressure world of celebrity, can evolve. People grow apart. Inner circles shift. New friends emerge. I mean, think about your own closest friends from six years ago. Are they still the exact same people you'd pick for your bridal party today? Probably not all of them.

The 'NO' price at 18% just feels ridiculously cheap to me. If I were putting my money down, I'd be all over that 18% 'NO'. My thinking is simple: for Ashley to be a bridesmaid, several things have to happen: 1. Taylor and Travis need to get engaged. 2. They need to actually get married (no easy feat for any couple, let alone global superstars). 3. Ashley needs to still be in Taylor's absolute inner circle at that time, *and* be selected over other potential friends, family, or newer acquaintances. Each of those steps has its own probability, and when you multiply them together, the chance of all of them lining up perfectly by 2030 feels a lot lower than 41%.

The market seems to be pricing in a lot of Swiftie optimism and perhaps underestimating the natural attrition of time and changing social dynamics. It’s almost like people are betting on a 'best case scenario' for this friendship enduring, rather than a more realistic assessment of future probabilities. I think the crowd here might be getting a little carried away by the romance of it all.

For me, the 18% on 'NO' represents a fantastic opportunity. It implies that there's an 82% chance that *something* will prevent Ashley from being a bridesmaid, whether it's the wedding not happening, their friendship changing, or Taylor choosing someone else. Given the incredibly long timeline and the volatile nature of celebrity relationships and friendships, I think that 82% is far too low. I'd put the 'NO' probability much, much higher. If you're looking for an undervalued play, this might just be it. I'm certainly considering a position.

📈

Ready to trade on this market?

Put your predictions to the test. Trade on Kalshi — the first federally regulated prediction market exchange in the US.

Trade on Kalshi →

More in Politics

A close-up shot of a gavel on a wooden desk, symbolizing the Speaker of the House position, with a blurred American flag in the background.
PoliticsJun 17, 20263 min read

Jim Jordan's Speaker Chances: What 12% Tells Me (and You)

I've been staring at the Kalshi market for Jim Jordan's Speaker bid, and its stubbornly low 12% 'YES' price tells a stark story.

Odds:Yes 12%No 88%
A portrait of Avigdor Lieberman, possibly with the Israeli flag or parliament in the background, overlaid with speculative charts or question marks.
PoliticsJun 16, 20264 min read

Avigdor Lieberman: A 17% Shot at PM by 2045? My Take on Kalshi's Long Play

I'm looking at Kalshi's market on Avigdor Lieberman becoming Israel's PM by 2045, and the 17% YES price has me thinking.

Odds:Yes 15%No 85%
A stylized depiction of artificial intelligence, perhaps a glowing brain or circuit board, with a calendar in the background showing 2028.
PoliticsJun 15, 20263 min read

AGI by 2028? The Market Says 'Nope,' and I'm Raising an Eyebrow.

Kalshi's AGI market shows skepticism for a 2028 announcement, but the 'announcement' clause has me questioning the crowd.

Odds:Yes 41%No 59%